<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>South Carolina Attorney General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scag.gov/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scag.gov</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>May 21, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9150</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9150#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agallego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion concerning the expungement of records pertaining to criminal charges in summary courts.  

Requested by: Robert L. McCurdy, Assistant Director, South Carolina Court Administration
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion concerning the expungement of records pertaining to criminal charges in summary courts.</p>
<p>Requested by: Robert L. McCurdy, Assistant Director, South Carolina Court Administration</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/mccurdy-r-l-os-9552-5-21-13-expungements-in-summary-courts.pdf">Read full opinion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9150/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney General Alan Wilson Statement on IRS’s Admitted Targeting of Groups Seeking Tax-Exempt Status</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9125</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9125#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leacy Burke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Today News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(COLUMBIA, S.C.)   Attorney General Alan Wilson issued the following statement regarding the IRS’s admitted targeting of groups seeking tax-exempt status: “It is deeply troubling that the Internal Revenue Service targeted organizations and individuals based on their political beliefs. Our freedom of speech and our equal protection under the law are the most basic tenets of our Republic. Both were ignored when the IRS unnecessarily harassed and audited individuals and organizations based on their name, not their paperwork. “This matter merits the highest level of scrutiny to investigate the serious misconduct and admitted targeting of groups seeking tax-exempt status by the...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(COLUMBIA, S.C.)   Attorney General Alan Wilson issued the following statement regarding the IRS’s admitted targeting of groups seeking tax-exempt status:</p>
<p><b><i>“It is deeply troubling that the Internal Revenue Service targeted organizations and individuals based on their political beliefs. Our freedom of speech and our equal protection under the law are the most basic tenets of our Republic. Both were ignored when the IRS unnecessarily harassed and audited individuals and organizations based on their name, not their paperwork.</i></b></p>
<p>“This matter merits the highest level of scrutiny to investigate the serious misconduct and admitted targeting of groups seeking tax-exempt status by the IRS.</p>
<p><b><i>“Reports indicate at least one South Carolina organization was targeted. To ensure the ongoing federal criminal investigation properly considers whether other South Carolinians were harmed, I encourage any 501(c) (4) organization in South Carolina who believes it was wrongfully targeted by the IRS based on its constitutionally protected beliefs to contact the South Carolina Attorney General’s office. Once gathered, my office will provide this information to the appropriate authority. It is important to determine whether other South Carolinians had their legal rights violated and to protect our most basic freedoms.”  </i></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9125/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 14, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9134</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9134#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agallego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion asking does an individual have to be a resident of South Carolina to be qualified for appointment to the position of Retiree Representative Member with the S.C. Retirement Investment Commission? 

Requested by: Darry Oliver, Chief Operating Officer, S.C. Retirement System Investment Commission
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion asking does an individual have to be a resident of South Carolina to be qualified for appointment to the position of Retiree Representative Member with the S.C. Retirement Investment Commission?</p>
<p>Requested by: Darry Oliver, Chief Operating Officer, S.C. Retirement System Investment Commission</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/oliver-d-os-9600-5-14-13-qualification-for-retiree-representative-member.pdf">Read full opinion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9134/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 8, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9093</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9093#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agallego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion “concerning whether PEBA may legally authorize private employers to participate in the State Health Plan Provider Networks, which will allow these private employers to obtain the same rates for medical services that the State Health Plan has negotiated.” 

Requested by: David K. Avant, Interim Executive Director, South Carolina Public Employee Benefit Authority
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion “concerning whether PEBA may legally authorize private employers to participate in the State Health Plan Provider Networks, which will allow these private employers to obtain the same rates for medical services that the State Health Plan has negotiated.”</p>
<p>Requested by: David K. Avant, Interim Executive Director, South Carolina Public Employee Benefit Authority</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/avant-d-k-os-9594-5-8-13-private-employers-participate-in-state-health-plan-provider-network.pdf">Read full opinion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9093/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 8, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9096</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9096#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agallego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion as to whether the South Carolina Public Charter School District (the “District”) can require charter schools it has sponsored to perform certain accounting tasks.

Requested by: The Honorable Todd Atwater, Member, House of Representatives
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion as to whether the South Carolina Public Charter School District (the “District”) can require charter schools it has sponsored to perform certain accounting tasks.</p>
<p>Requested by: The Honorable Todd Atwater, Member, House of Representatives</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/atwater-t-k-os-9584-5-8-13-sc-charter-schools-act-of-1996.pdf">Read full opinion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9096/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 6, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9090</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9090#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agallego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion as to whether the Richland County First Steps Partnership’s (the “Richland Partnership”) Board has the authority under State law to purchase a building in which to house its operations. 

Requested by: Susan DeVenny, Director, S.C. First Steps to School Readiness
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion as to whether the Richland County First Steps Partnership’s (the “Richland Partnership”) Board has the authority under State law to purchase a building in which to house its operations.</p>
<p>Requested by: Susan DeVenny, Director, S.C. First Steps to School Readiness</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/devenny-s-os-9591-5-6-13-richland-county-first-steps-proposal-to-purchase-building.pdf">Read full opinion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9090/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AG Wilson Applauds Passage of “Ashley Hall Bill”</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9072</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9072#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apiper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Today News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ “An important civics lesson can be learned from this bill and how Ashley Hall parents such as Anna Murray and many others who set an example for citizens can effectively come together to make our state a safer place to live, work, and raise a family.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><i>Mental Health Registry Bill Protects Our Children and 2<sup>nd</sup> Amendment Rights</i></b></p>
<p><b>(COLUMBIA, S.C.)</b>   South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson released the following statement on ratification of the “Ashley Hall Bill” (H. 3560) after the House unanimously concurred Senate amendments today.</p>
<p>On February 4, 2013, Alice Boland arrived at Ashley Hall School in Charleston with a loaded handgun and repeatedly pulled the trigger at administrators, teachers, and students gathered outside for the afternoon car pool. Thankfully, the gun never chambered. However, Ms. Boland’s ability to purchase a firearm, despite her history of threats to assassinate President George W. Bush and her numerous court-ordered mental health commitments provided the impetus for a legislative remedy.</p>
<p><b><i>“Eighty seven days after a near tragedy at Ashley Hall School in Charleston, the General Assembly passed one of the year’s most important pieces of legislation. The ‘Ashley Hall Bill’ keeps South Carolinians safe by preventing those who have been court adjudicated mentally ill from purchasing firearms, while also protecting the constitutional rights of lawful gun owners.</i></b></p>
<p><b><i>“February 4<sup>th</sup>’s disturbing incident outside Ashley Hall School came dangerously close to becoming another Virginia Tech massacre. The incident was a wake-up call for our state and demonstrated the need for mental health reporting in South Carolina. </i></b></p>
<p><b><i> “This bill in no way infringes on the rights of law-abiding South Carolinians like myself who legally own guns.  It simply ensures that people who are not lawfully allowed to carry a gun cannot get one.  It also enables those who have recovered from their mental illness and are no longer a danger to themselves or their community to fully regain their Second Amendment rights.</i></b></p>
<p><b><i> “An important civics lesson can be learned from this bill and how Ashley Hall parents such as Anna Murray and many others who set an example for citizens can effectively come together to make our state a safer place to live, work, and raise a family.</i></b></p>
<p>“I look forward to Governor Haley signing this bill into law, and I commend legislative leaders such as  Rick Quinn, Eddie Tallon, Leon Stavrinakis, Greg Gregory, Larry Martin, Paul Thurmond, and the entire General Assembly for quickly responding to this matter and working with the Attorney General’s office, the Lieutenant Governor, the House Speaker, SLED, NRA, Probate Courts, Sheriffs, Solicitors, Police Chiefs, Court Administration, and Ashley Hall parents to accomplish this legislation.”</p>
<p>Legislators echoed Attorney General Wilson’s remarks.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><strong>Lieutenant Governor Glenn McConnell stated</strong></em>, &#8220;This is a positive example of how grassroots can bring change. It has been a wonderful experience for all of us in public office.&#8221;</p>
<p><b><i>Senator Greg Gregory stated, </i></b><b>“</b>The passage of this bill is one of the significant accomplishments of the General Assembly this year. It provides a common sense partial solution to gun violence while in no way diminishing the 2nd Amendment rights of South Carolinians.”  Gregory continued, “Passage of the bill is due to one of the finest collective efforts among citizens, legislators and state agencies that I&#8217;ve witnessed.”</p>
<p><b><i>Senator Larry Martin stated, “</i></b><i>I want to applaud the Ashley Hall “Moms” for their untiring efforts to turn a tragic occurrence into a positive result for the people of our state.  Their example should be a testament to others of what our citizens can and should do when they take their time and abilities to work  to make our state a better one for ourselves and our children.  I can’t say enough about the efforts and cooperation of the Ashley Hall “Moms”, the Attorney General and his staff, SLED, and Senator Gregory and his subcommittee for the work to get this important legislation passed.” </i></p>
<p><b><i>Representative Leon Stavrinakis stated, </i></b><i>&#8220;What happened at Ashley Hall sent shockwaves through everyone in the legislature and we acted as quickly as we could to fix this glaring loophole in the system. As I have said before, while we did not have the ultimate tragedy at Ashley Hall, it wasn&#8217;t because the system was working. The system was broken. With the passage of this bill, no one with a criminal history of mental illness will be able to legally purchase a firearm in South Carolina.&#8221; <b></b></i></p>
<p>Representative Eddie Tallon stated, “This bill would not have been possible without a team effort. Today is a great day in South Carolina because of folks like Anna Murray, the Attorney General, Lt. Governor, Speaker, SLED, and the House and Senate working together to simultaneously protect our communities and the Constitution.”<b></b></p>
<p>Representative Rick Quinn stated, “The Ashley Hall legislation is the byproduct of bipartisanship and the Attorney General, SLED, and law enforcement working with the NRA to protect our state while not infringing on the gun rights of law abiding citizens. It is a miracle the gun did not chamber at Ashley Hall. However, this bill shows that good can come from near tragedies.” <b></b></p>
<p>H. 3560 enables South Carolina to report the names of those who have been court adjudicated mentally ill to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS.)  The legislation was supported by a bipartisan coalition of law enforcement officials and legislators, as well as the National Rifle Association.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9072/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9086</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9086#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 14:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agallego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion regarding the language of South Carolina Code Section 40-59-260 providing that “an owner must personally appear and sign” a building permit application, may an individual under a Power of Attorney authority specifying the Attorney-In-Fact’s specific authorizations, properly executed and witnessed and recorded in the permitting county be an adequate substitute to the requirement that the owner “personally appear” and meet the requirements under the law. 

Requested by: The Honorable Chip Huggins, Member, House of Representatives
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion regarding the language of South Carolina Code Section 40-59-260 providing that “an owner must personally appear and sign” a building permit application, may an individual under a Power of Attorney authority specifying the Attorney-In-Fact’s specific authorizations, properly executed and witnessed and recorded in the permitting county be an adequate substitute to the requirement that the owner “personally appear” and meet the requirements under the law.</p>
<p>Requested by: The Honorable Chip Huggins, Member, House of Representatives</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/huggins-c-os-9543-5-2-13-power-of-attorney-v.-personally-appear-building-permit-application.pdf">Read full opinion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9086/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 30, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9057</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9057#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agallego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion related to the Little Mountain Reunion (the “Reunion”), a festival that has historically been held on an annual basis in the Town of Little Mountain (the “Town”).

Requested by: The Honorable Jana W. Jayroe, Mayor, Town of Little Mountain
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion related to the Little Mountain Reunion (the “Reunion”), a festival that has historically been held on an annual basis in the Town of Little Mountain (the “Town”).</p>
<p>Requested by: The Honorable Jana W. Jayroe, Mayor, Town of Little Mountain<b></b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/jayroe-j-w-os-9575-4-30-13-little-mountain-reunion-sale-of-alcohol-at-town-event.pdf">Read full opinion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9057/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 24, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9013</link>
		<comments>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9013#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agallego</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2013 Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scag.gov/?p=9013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion concerning the Office’s interpretation of the Equal Access to Interscholastic Activities Act, S.C. Code § 59-63-100, as it applies to child who is taken out of a public school and home schooled. Specifically, whether such a child must complete one year of home schooling under the Act before he or she may participate in interscholastic activities.

Requested by: The Honorable Wm. Weston J. Newton, Member, House of Representatives
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opinion concerning the Office’s interpretation of the Equal Access to Interscholastic Activities Act, S.C. Code § 59-63-100, as it applies to child who is taken out of a public school and home schooled. Specifically, whether such a child must complete one year of home schooling under the Act before he or she may participate in interscholastic activities.</p>
<p>Requested by: The Honorable Wm. Weston J. Newton, Member, House of Representatives</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/newton-w-w-j-os-9589-4-24-13-equal-access-to-interscholastic-activities-act.pdf">Read full opinion</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scag.gov/archives/9013/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
