JAN 05, 1984
Whether under both the statutory and case authority of this state it is acceptable to allow an agent of the party seeking repossession of personal property by claim and delivery to act as surety as required by Sections 15-69-50 (Court of Common Pleas) or 22-3-1330 (Magistrate Court) of the SC Code of Laws.
Requested by: The Honorable D.M. McEachin, Jr., Member, House of Representatives
Read Full Opinion
Back to Opinions Archive
