DEC 22, 1988
Concerning whether the state supplement to the salaries of probate judges should be considered a part of the base salary counties are required to pay; if the county provides cost to living supplements to other employees and whether judges are entitled to the same benefits; and for counties whose fiscal year does not coincide with the state fiscal year, when salary increases to master-in-equity salaries made necessarily by increases in circuit judges salaries should become effective?
Requested by: George A. Markert, Assistant Director, South Carolina Court Administration
Read Full Opinion
Back to Opinions Archive
